Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on h

I kid you not.

According to my ap world teacher, she raised both arms, and let down her armpit hair to the prince, who grabbed one bunch in each hand....

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

No, it's not true.

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

no..........lol

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

Ew gross the correct answer was her beautiful golden HEAD hair :)

so your question is false; hope i helped.

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

That is very funny... too much! Tell your ap world teacher we like the joke.

EDIT: On second thought, demand to see the source material he/she got it from as well. What a scream...

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

This is the first I've heard that one. I remember in the story I read when I was little she would let down her head hair for him to climb on then one day the old woman who was keeping her in the tower cut her hair off so the prince could no longer get to her.

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

check this out.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/grimm/

most versions of fairytales now are not the original version. so,that may be true.

Is it true that in the original version of Repunzel, she let down her armpit hair, not the hair on her head?

i thought it was her nose hair..ha,ha!a lot of her fans will be disappointed.your teacher is a humorist..but it is really her hair that the prince used to climb in the tower.